tissac
05-06 04:54 PM
My Wife had the same issue when her H1B got approved. Her attorney (It was his mistake) had to amend the petition . But I remember we got a new receipt number and a new I-94 with the corrected DOB when the final approval came. The bad thing is the amendement application also enters the H1-B cycle of months for approval if not filed under premium processing. We had plans to travel back to India and do stamping at that time. I had to pay this attorney $1000 for PP even though it was his mistake.
Regards,
tissac
Regards,
tissac
wallpaper Zoom
pappu
01-24 12:25 AM
lot of members these days ask about various companies. You may also want to directly ask the company too all such questions.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=43890&postcount=19
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=43890&postcount=19
Dhundhun
10-14 02:52 AM
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
Not much difference - EB2 India gained two months, EB3 gained three months.
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 1 May 2002 1 May 2002
FX 15 July 2001 15 July 2001
F2A 8 Februrary 2004 8 February 2004
F2B 15 January 2000 15 January 2000
F3 1 July 2000 1 July 2000
F4 22 July 1997 15 November 1997
E1 Current Current
E2 1 June 2003 Current
E3 1 October 2001 1 May 2005
EW 15 Janurary 2003 15 Janurary 2003
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
Not much difference - EB2 India gained two months, EB3 gained three months.
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 1 May 2002 1 May 2002
FX 15 July 2001 15 July 2001
F2A 8 Februrary 2004 8 February 2004
F2B 15 January 2000 15 January 2000
F3 1 July 2000 1 July 2000
F4 22 July 1997 15 November 1997
E1 Current Current
E2 1 June 2003 Current
E3 1 October 2001 1 May 2005
EW 15 Janurary 2003 15 Janurary 2003
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
2011 compaq presario cq56-111sa
va_dude
08-18 05:33 PM
dude.. are you talking about renewing your AP or EAD?
I dont think there's any such thing as renewing an I-140.
get the facts right.
I dont think there's any such thing as renewing an I-140.
get the facts right.
more...
k_usa
01-29 08:57 PM
Take it easy, USICS is not going to crosscheck your address. That's okay.
Anyway now you can do change of address online from USICS website.
Anyway now you can do change of address online from USICS website.
akhilmahajan
07-20 01:06 PM
Medical results are valid till 1 years from the date they are done. Also if you got it done from a uscis approved doctor u r all set.
Lot of ppl get vaccination and everything done before hand.
Check with ur lawyer, but as far as i know it should be good.
Lot of ppl get vaccination and everything done before hand.
Check with ur lawyer, but as far as i know it should be good.
more...
chanukya
06-05 04:06 PM
Please keep blogging
2010 compaq presario cq56-115dx.
tinamatthew
07-21 03:37 PM
no
no?? What's your question if I may ask please
no?? What's your question if I may ask please
more...
GCPagla
02-20 01:10 PM
I am already working on EAD. I have got an employment offer from a big fortune 500 firm as a lead technical analyst. The offer is too good to miss. I am trying to understand in my job will be "same or similar" while my job responsibility was "programmer analyst" in labor certificate and i would get a job as lead architect. Following are some more details about may labor doc.
a) Though my job title is like programmer analyst, my SOC job code is given as 17-2071.00 which is "Electrical Engineer"
I was never an electrical engineer (not even by my education). I do not know why the original filer used such a SOC code. Now my new role (lead technical architect) will have a SOC code as 15-1031 as that is for computer architect.
Morever my new employer will not provide me a Ac21 portability matching my labor cert.
My role responsibility is following as per labor cert.
Job Title: Programmer/ Analyst/Systems, Software/Engineer/Developer, or Related to IT
Reponsibility:
develop, create and modify general computer application software. Analysis user needs and design, develop software solutions. Design, develop, analyse and implement software and end user product. Coordinate various account projects with IT consultants; nurture close relationship with the major account customers by providing quality technical support and apply principles of computer science, engineering and mathematical analysis.
Do you feel that changing the job as lead architect willl be a paradigm shift for me causing my GC gone denied?
Thankis in advance.
a) Though my job title is like programmer analyst, my SOC job code is given as 17-2071.00 which is "Electrical Engineer"
I was never an electrical engineer (not even by my education). I do not know why the original filer used such a SOC code. Now my new role (lead technical architect) will have a SOC code as 15-1031 as that is for computer architect.
Morever my new employer will not provide me a Ac21 portability matching my labor cert.
My role responsibility is following as per labor cert.
Job Title: Programmer/ Analyst/Systems, Software/Engineer/Developer, or Related to IT
Reponsibility:
develop, create and modify general computer application software. Analysis user needs and design, develop software solutions. Design, develop, analyse and implement software and end user product. Coordinate various account projects with IT consultants; nurture close relationship with the major account customers by providing quality technical support and apply principles of computer science, engineering and mathematical analysis.
Do you feel that changing the job as lead architect willl be a paradigm shift for me causing my GC gone denied?
Thankis in advance.
hair HP Compaq Presario CQ56-103SA
lazycis
10-17 12:06 PM
Thank you! Hopefully 8c/page is not big money for me.
All you need is History/Documents report to check upon the status. So that's 8c per case. Opinions are free in PACER.
All you need is History/Documents report to check upon the status. So that's 8c per case. Opinions are free in PACER.
more...
fcres
01-15 01:59 PM
Sec. 45. 2 Priority date of applicants.
As it sound to me It means PD of primary applicant will be the PD of spouse and child.
I did not follow.
Anyway this is the situation. I'm in EB3 with a PD Dec 2002. DH is in EB2 with a PD in 2006. Can he file I-485 for us using my PD according to the above law?
As it sound to me It means PD of primary applicant will be the PD of spouse and child.
I did not follow.
Anyway this is the situation. I'm in EB3 with a PD Dec 2002. DH is in EB2 with a PD in 2006. Can he file I-485 for us using my PD according to the above law?
hot hp compaq presario cq56-111sa.
adfrn111
01-09 11:08 PM
thanks
more...
house Compaq CQ56-219WM Presario
mdipi
10-20 07:49 PM
whats the diff?
tattoo Compaq Presario CQ56-111SA Laptop T4500 3GB 320GB 15quot; | eBay UK
lacrossegc
07-03 01:12 PM
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/house-republicans-vow-to-take-the-offensive-on-immigration-2007-07-03.html
more...
pictures HP Compaq CQ56-111SA XL574EA
anjans
07-09 02:44 PM
Of course you can start PERM in your 6th year. Make sure you do it soon and file for I-140 promptly so that once that is approved you can get 3 yr H1 approval
dresses Compaq CQ56-252SA. Compaq Presario CQ56-252SA Laptop
Blog Feeds
08-01 07:00 AM
Australian Immigration Minister Chris Evans announced recently a new agreement between Australia and New Zealand to improve identity checks and border security. Australia and New Zealand recently signed a memorandum of understanding [MoU] to share biometric data, an agreement that will further strengthen our nations' border security. Biometrics is widely used in the international community as an effective tool to manage visa and immigration processes, improve identity management and combat fraud.
At the Five Countries Conference (FCC) in London a memorandum of understanding was signed between Australia and New Zealand. The Conference enables Five data sharing Countries to exchange information and agree a way forward to improve border security. FCC data-sharing helps to establish the true identity of people whose identities or nationalities were previously unknown or uncertain, and has been used in Australia to check the identities of irregular maritime arrivals, other people in immigration detention and illegal foreign fishers. Since 2006, more than 100 000 fingerprint records have been exchanged, helping Australia and FCC partner countries to establish the true identities and immigration histories of people whose identities were unknown or uncertain. Collection and sharing of biometric data is a proven tool in the fight against identity fraud and can prevent unlawful entrants' efforts to thwart Australia's border and visa processes.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/australian_immigration_and_new.html)
At the Five Countries Conference (FCC) in London a memorandum of understanding was signed between Australia and New Zealand. The Conference enables Five data sharing Countries to exchange information and agree a way forward to improve border security. FCC data-sharing helps to establish the true identity of people whose identities or nationalities were previously unknown or uncertain, and has been used in Australia to check the identities of irregular maritime arrivals, other people in immigration detention and illegal foreign fishers. Since 2006, more than 100 000 fingerprint records have been exchanged, helping Australia and FCC partner countries to establish the true identities and immigration histories of people whose identities were unknown or uncertain. Collection and sharing of biometric data is a proven tool in the fight against identity fraud and can prevent unlawful entrants' efforts to thwart Australia's border and visa processes.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/australian_immigration_and_new.html)
more...
makeup Buy.com - New Laptop Battery for HP COMPAQ PRESARIO CQ56-111SA PRESARIO
sweet23guyin
02-19 10:49 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17237
girlfriend Compaq Presario CQ56-111EO
texanmom
08-24 11:39 AM
Its just a blank page
hairstyles The Compaq Presario CQ56-104SA
permfiling
05-18 05:42 PM
If you haven't filed I-485 yet, you cannot use AC21 as it requires I-485 to be pending for more than 180 days. It means, that you're stuck with your ex-employer for GC processing unless your new employer is willing to file new LC and I-140 for you. You can port the PD of your approved I-140 to the new one.
Once your PD becomes current, then you can file I-485.
I think you got my question differently. My ex-employer is A where I had my I140 approved . Now I am with employer B. If i want to continue with B then I have to file LC+140 with old PD but if I go back to A in same role then I have to file only 485 but my LCA is specific to location in CA .My question is wether I join A in NY and still file AOS based on old PD or not.
Once your PD becomes current, then you can file I-485.
I think you got my question differently. My ex-employer is A where I had my I140 approved . Now I am with employer B. If i want to continue with B then I have to file LC+140 with old PD but if I go back to A in same role then I have to file only 485 but my LCA is specific to location in CA .My question is wether I join A in NY and still file AOS based on old PD or not.
Blog Feeds
12-22 02:30 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
mlyn
11-04 01:58 AM
Hi:
Maybe some of you can help me with my problem. I was directly hired to work in the US with two other colleagues. Our PD was April 04. We got our LC�s last year. My two friends and I applied for I-140 last December 2006. (same job, same employer sponsoring us). The two got their I-140 by June and were able to receive their GC courtesy of the July fiasco.
Last May 07, I was told that I was mailed an RFE. I never received it. As you may know, you can only follow this up after a month. Three phone calls (and months) and two faxes (two months) later, still no letter. My lawyer is at his wits� ends. The other day, he gets an appointment at a USCIS center near our area. He says this office �has no jurisdiction over my case� and that this was a long shot. An immigration officer looks at the computer system in the office and says that the system�s list of RFE cases does not include my name, and perhaps there was an error. Perhaps�
Has anybody heard of a similar case? My lawyer is now suggesting that I write a congressman for help. Do you think this will help?
My husband and I filed our I-485 + his EAD last July 19. Today we received acknowledgment receipts for both and a notice that we have to go thru FP next week. . Is this a positive sign , or does this mean nothing at all? I noticed that current PD for 3rd preference visas has rolled back to Aug 02. Can anyone hazard a guess as to how long we may reasonably have to wait for a GC? Or for my husband�s EAD?
Thanks.
Maybe some of you can help me with my problem. I was directly hired to work in the US with two other colleagues. Our PD was April 04. We got our LC�s last year. My two friends and I applied for I-140 last December 2006. (same job, same employer sponsoring us). The two got their I-140 by June and were able to receive their GC courtesy of the July fiasco.
Last May 07, I was told that I was mailed an RFE. I never received it. As you may know, you can only follow this up after a month. Three phone calls (and months) and two faxes (two months) later, still no letter. My lawyer is at his wits� ends. The other day, he gets an appointment at a USCIS center near our area. He says this office �has no jurisdiction over my case� and that this was a long shot. An immigration officer looks at the computer system in the office and says that the system�s list of RFE cases does not include my name, and perhaps there was an error. Perhaps�
Has anybody heard of a similar case? My lawyer is now suggesting that I write a congressman for help. Do you think this will help?
My husband and I filed our I-485 + his EAD last July 19. Today we received acknowledgment receipts for both and a notice that we have to go thru FP next week. . Is this a positive sign , or does this mean nothing at all? I noticed that current PD for 3rd preference visas has rolled back to Aug 02. Can anyone hazard a guess as to how long we may reasonably have to wait for a GC? Or for my husband�s EAD?
Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment